Andrew's page

31
May

Now that I have Internet access again, I was planning on doing a post about being forcefully cut off from the world online (except for at work) and how that shifts one’s perceptions about media, communications and people in general.  There was also the possibility of discussing the trials and tribulations of moving and uprooting oneself successfully, but feeling uncomfortable about the situation all the same.  I might have written something about living on my own and being the only animate thing in my abode, the stiffening silences and the discomfort of hearing noises in the night.  But towards the end of last week, I received news that couldn’t be ignored.

Mr. Black, one of my favorite teachers from high school (or any school), the educator most responsible for my world-view, writing style and current interests, the man who taught so many so much, died.

I’ve only heard second-hand and third-hand details, so I’m not going to jump to any conclusions about the hows or the whys.  All I know is that he’s no longer here, and like so many of my former classmates, I feel a sense of loss.

Mr. Black taught “Theory of Knowledge,” the capstone course for the IB senior class at my high school.  It was an odd mish-mash of art, psychology, history, anthropology, English, and most of the other social sciences.  And it was quite subjective.

In one assignment, we were told to take pictures that represented a phrase from two words picked out of a hat.  Unfortunately, all of the words were figurative, so there was no easy way to take a picture.  Somehow, my interpretation of “Cool Revenge” wound up winning Best in Class:

When I asked Mr. Black later about judging and how it was determined if a photo matched its theme, he told me it didn’t; it was all up to the observers.  Art cannot be objective, he said, because it’s created by subjective people.  Every art-related assignment we had, from painting self-portraits in the style of famous painters to creating abstract sculptures, was like this.  There were no clearly-defined parameters or rules, and the scale of grading was abstract.

For a class of kids who were beginning to realize the power of the Internet and whose very academic life followed the motto, “I.B., therefore, I B.S.,” it was almost maddening.  We couldn’t fake our way through these assignments, so we actually had to apply ourselves and put in effort.  Studying was useless; it was all about creating tangible results from every piece of education we’d absorbed up until that point.  It was hard work, and sometimes, it seemed terribly unfair.

If one student had hired another to write a ToK paper for him and if Mr. Black could tell, he would give a higher grade to the paid paper.  Soon, the practice stopped entirely.  We did our own work with our own methods, and for the first time for many of us, we spoke in our own voices.  We wanted to succeed on our own terms, and every one of us respected him for making us do that.  For the first time since my freshman year English teacher shot down my authorial dreams because I used too many comma splices, I wanted to write again.  We were inspired.

Not as much could be said for the History teacher who would surf the web for topless biker babes during class presentations on the socioeconomic fallout from the Bay of Pigs.

Mr. Black was also one of the faculty advisers for the Speech and Debate team.  While I originally joined to have a way of seeing a lady-friend who was on the S&D team for another school, I soon found myself drawn to the practice itself.  On the team, we were encouraged to experiment and interpret things differently than we might have during normal class: dramatic interpretations of Fight Club and SLC Punk! while other students were reenacting stories of AIDS and Leukemia suffering; presentations on the distinction between nerds and geeks or the evolution of reality TV up to the early years of American Idol where competing schools offered dissections of the mining potential of the Oort Cloud and the scientific potential of testing on Capuchin Monkeys.  We were going against the grain, and while we didn’t win many contests, it was great fun.  Also, it helped me get over my public speaking anxiety.  Had I been coerced into reciting scenes from The Jungle or presenting data on the impact of the Ozone Layer’s depletion on the flora and fauna of Australia, my life would be very different right now.

A number of my old classmates have taken to Facebook, writing stories of Mr. Black’s impact on their careers (academic and professional), writing great quotes that inspire them to this day.  Truth be told, I remember little of what he said to me.  I can recall the assignments and lessons that he doled out in his trademark deadpan tone, always slightly muffled through a bushy salt-and-pepper beard that hid any evidence of a smirk or a scowl.  I remember that he always seemed to be one of the last teachers to leave, willing to stay past the last bell to discuss the day’s lesson with interested students, debate a current event, or just chat about life.  I remember that during the faculty talent show, he performed spoken word renditions of pop songs with such perfect poise, eloquence and charm that it was impossible not to laugh.  But I have no memories of anything profound or life-changing that he said to me.

Then again, his teaching influenced my work ethic, my interest in culture, and my perspective on much of the social world.  His lessons challenged me in a way that few assignments from anyone, educator or manger, ever have.  Maybe his quotes have become so ingrained in my mind that I can no longer attribute them to him, though Mr. Black would probably argue that I’ve got a serious case of an attributional bias going on right now.

In the years since graduation, I’ve met many people who were IB students in other schools.  When we compare notes, it seems like their ToK classes were more like glorified writing sessions.  Many times, the IB alums would comment with a tinge of jealousy that they wished they’d had a teacher like Mr. Black, as their lessons were devoid of any real content or inspiration.  It was a source of comfort to know that he was still teaching, helping disaffected smart kids combat Senioritis while pushing them to new heights of creativity.

Now, though, my teacher is gone, and I’m not sure how to respond.  There are no clearly-defined parameters or rules for this sort of thing.  It all seems to terribly unfair and arbitrary.  But thanks to Mr. Black, I have some experience on dealing with the unknown, and not just in theory.

Share

19
May

Last year, I got you guys a video.  This year, I got you something a little more abstract: 50 blocks.

50 blocks is the difference between adolescence and adulthood.  It’s the space between dependencies and independence.  It’s the starting line for self-reliance and full control.  It’s-

Oh, forget this horse-crap. I’m moving.

For those who missed the riveting tale, I basically failed at life two years ago and had to move back in with my parents.  It hasn’t been terrible, but at the same time, I’ve wanted to get out and move on to the “grown-up” stage of my life.  Sleeping in the same bed I had in high school was a torturous reminder of how far I had to go in life, and how far short I was from where I had imagined and planned to be when I graduated college.

As of this coming Saturday, that will no longer be the case.

I found a swanky one-bedroom apartment in a good complex that’s pretty close to work, and am in the process of realizing that I now need to buy all those little things that I took for granted, like soap dispensers, towels and toilet paper.  Also, furniture.  It’s been interesting, to say the least.

Hopefully, moving and getting set up shouldn’t take too long, but I will definitely be without Internet for a good part of next week, so you may be post-less during that time.  One post and then a week-long break; interesting way to kick off year two, right?

But enough about me, let’s talk about the blog!

Aside from downgrading the blog post output (150 as compared with the previous year’s 340), the site has been pretty much the same.  I’ve had a chance to meet a number of Internet blog friends in real life, and some of them are awesome! Others are okay, and other-others appear to be working on a long-form, Catfish-like deception to the Internet at large.  Still, it’s nice to interact with folks in a way that’s different from chat windows and Skype, even if it turns out that some of ‘em kinda suck.

It was interesting trying a different level of community involvement; in between people getting on my case for donating to charity and rebooting the NMH Facebook page just in time for its first-ever contest, things got a little more interactive, instead of me blogging at you and occasionally responding to comments like a week after they were posted.  I’m working on a few things to improve the whole blogger/reader thing we’ve got going on, and welcome any comments, (polite) criticism and suggestions.

Speaking of contests and moving, I’ve decided to combine the two.

That’s right – it’s time for The NMH Second Birthday Contest!

Just become a fan of the blog on Facebook, and you’ll be automatically entered to win a box full of random goodies that I’ve scrounged up whilst moving – a smattering of movies, cds, books and other goodies.  No odd socks or dilapidated action figures here!

Thanks to everyone who’s been reading, Tweeting, Facebooking, commenting, emailing, linking, and supporting the blog over the past two years.  Without you, this page would be the equivalent of a hobo on a street corner shouting random life lessons at pedestrians.

Share

17
May

There’s a level in the old Sega Genesis game based on Disney’s Aladdin where, as the titular character, you have to navigate the world inside of the genie’s bottle.  And in that level, there’s a section in which the player must hop from one balloon to the next across a chasm leading to an endless drop to get to the other side.  In the early parts, there are a few places to land, but once things get going, the only option is to finish up or be cast into the abyss.  Thanks to the magic of Youtube, you can see what I’m talking about here.

I must have played that level a few hundred times, and I’m sure that Aladdin fell into the abyss of the lamp with alarming regularity.  Sometimes, I would get so fed up that I would enter the level skip code (ABBAABBA) and move on to the Sultan’s Palace, which had these awesome flamingos that would go “Bleeeech” when you jumped on them.

There’s probably some extended metaphor I could make about taking risks and being willing to fail and needing to move on with one’s life so one doesn’t fall into an abyss of their own making, but that’s ground that’s been covered both here and elsewhere.  Instead, let’s talk about cheat codes.

I don’t mean the “Extra hundred Master Balls in Pokemon Red and/or Blue”-type cheat code, I mean the “Link starts the game with the Master Sword”-type cheat code.  The “Driving a super-fast tank with a cannon in Age of Empires“-type cheat code.  The “9/10ths of all results for the Konami Code”-type cheat code.  I mean the kinds of unfair advantages that elevate someone past the point of any conceivable equality with their competitors.  This is the professional sports shut-out, the overqualified Ivy League grad whose dad knows the CEO, or the person who won the lottery last week.  These individuals exist on a higher plane, sometimes through circumstances of birth or luck, and sometimes through careful planning and sacrifice.

Whatever it is, it seems like it’s not fair.  And when viewed from most perspectives, it’s not.  It seems like these people have unlocked some sort of Game Genie all-access pass to higher levels and achievements that you can’t even find in the official strategy guide.  You’re left in the dust, wondering how you could have been surpassed so quickly.  The phrase “life isn’t fair” is a cold comfort as Rod Stewart’s “Some Guys Have All the Luck” fortuitously comes on the radio.

There’s no way to get back at them, and it’s not like you can just copy their strategies outright.  Much like Warren Buffett’s dozens of books on personal finance success, there are a few tidbits that will always be left out to keep you from really understanding the hows and whys of the real-world cheat codes.  You can’t pause the game to figure out what button combos might unlock the God Mode attributes you’ve been searching for.

It’s easier to just code in new cheats yourself, or dig up old ones that have been forgotten.

This may sound counter-intuitive; after all, deviating from the normal rules and regulations when it comes to anything from professional success to personal victories might come across as underhanded and cruel, but if there’s no harm in it and nothing preventing you from doing so, go ahead!  Four-Hour Workweek author Tim Ferriss frequently cites how he dropped and quickly regained a large amount of weight to win a martial arts tournament.  Media organizations use subtle brainwashing tricks to turn you over to their point of view.  You can even find posts on this very blog that teach you how to influence others through body language.

There are no rules of conduct when it comes to getting ahead in life; people will always lie, cheat, steal, exploit, trash-talk, bribe, scheme and misinform others to get their way.  And at the same time, others come into the game with more advantages and opportunities than we might see in ten lifetimes.  However, complaining and worrying about these people will only prevent you from gaining sturdier footing and finding your own strategies to succeed.

Instead of making it to the Sultan’s Palace, you’ll be trapped in the imaginary world of the lamp.

Share

12
May

No one has ever asked me to speak at a graduation ceremony.  I have friends who did, but I can’t tell you much beyond a basic outline of what they talked about.  Whatever messages they had were temporary, and evaporated into the air once they were spoken.  Last year, I decided to give my own message in a more tangible form.  And this year, I’m at it again.  Here’s some unsolicited advice for the Leaders of Tomorrow that won’t be announced in any auditoriums, stadiums, multi-purpose rooms or theaters.  You can pretend that’s where you heard it, though.  I won’t mind.

I read in a comic book once that there’s a much smaller number of people who run the world than the number of people who make the world run.  And while it would be nice to think that we’ll all end up in the first group, it’s not that bad being with everyone else in the majority.  For one thing, there are more people to spend time with.  It’s more comfortable when you know you’re part of a team that works together; it’s why cultures are based on groups, not just individuals.

There’s little point in talking about dreams, the future, possibilities and opportunity.  If you’ve spent years of your life on a set path towards success or if you’ve spent years of your life trying to figure out how vegetable oil can be an ingredient in Mountain Dew even though it has no oily taste, you’ve already mapped out your plans for the next decade or so.  If you’ve breezed by, no speech will make you realize your full potential.  That has to come from you.

Some of you will never, and I mean never, figure out what it is that makes you truly special.  You might stumble around for years trying to figure out what can make you feel fulfilled both personally and professionally before you settle on something that you’re just good at.  This is fine, and it’s more normal than you might think.  In a survey I just made up, over half of everybody has settled for doing something that they’re good at.  But “good” and “great” and “special” and “fulfilled” and “potato” are all relative terms; you might think you’re slumming it while others are blown away by your skill and expertise.

Then again, you’ll probably be too distracted with your personal life to take a fully vested interest in quantifying the exact details of your professional life.  This has nothing to do with the bills and loan payments and insurance and taxes you will soon be facing, but rather the odd sensation that comes with the realization that Full-Fledged Adulthood isn’t like taking a step up, but is more like walking up a ramp with a very slight incline.  There’s no magic test, no shining moment that solidifies your position as a citizen of the world and one of the enlightened, responsible masses.  You might still make the same dumb mistakes you’ve been making for years.  You might try to stay out all night partying well into your thirties.  You might never want to get rid of that Black Eyed Peas concert shirt you scored for $10 after the show five years ago.  Being an adult is really just being an older kid.  So eat ice cream for breakfast once in a while.

Speaking of ice cream, I could really go for some right now.  After all, most of you are waiting for me to be done so you can collect your diplomas, have your pictures taken and go about your lives as new graduates.  The most painful part of any graduation is sitting though the speeches and well-wishers.  It’s like an American Idol results show: hours of build-up to something that ends up taking only a few seconds.

So here’s the part where I’m supposed to offer you some short snippets of advice.  Go off and do your thing, even if it’s not in the place you’d expected to be.  Find happiness and contentment where you can.  Don’t have ice cream for breakfast every morning, or you’ll need to get a lot of toothpaste and a really good dentist.

And whether you plan on running the world or just helping make the world run, take this time to relax; you’ve earned it.  I mean, you just got through another graduation speech.

Share

10
May

I received an email the other day.  There’s nothing particularly significant about that; I receive quite a few emails every day, even if a good deal of them are spam.  The thing about this email though, is that it was about three weeks late.

The person who sent it is usually late with their emails; I never send them anything that needs a fast reply, since it usually takes them a few days to get back to me.  But I do expect a response.

The email I’d sent leading up to the late reply was regarding a trip that I’d had to New York; I had heard that they would be there, and since I was going to be in the city, I wanted to see if they would like to meet up.  By the time they emailed be back, my trip was finished and I was home.

It’s almost impossible to not check your email these days.  While people used to have to sit down at their computers at home to check it, access these days can be performed on even the most basic cell phones.  You get a count of new messages, so you know what you haven’t seen before.  Even if you let it build up, you can still find the point where you haven’t read messages, and can respond at a decent clip.  Unless you’ve cut yourself off from the Internet (which was not the case in the above story), there’s no good reason for an email response that comes more than a week after the other message.

Then again, there’s no real Code of Conduct about this thing, is there?  People are still arguing about the proper time to call someone up after a good first date; there are dozens of questions about social networking responses, and even instant messengers can be confusing.  So here’s a few suggestions on how long you have to respond to a visual or auditory message on (almost) any service before you go from “late” to “jerk being used as an example of jerkish behavior in a blog post”:

Email: One week. There’s a good number of reasons to not answer an email right away: busy day, broken computer/phone, no Internet, thinking up a thoughtful response, vacation, etc.  But as mentioned above, it’s almost harder to not check your email.  So if it takes you a few days to get back to someone, that’s fine.  Just make sure that the rest of your online dealings follow suit, or you’ll come off as someone not interested in communicating with your conversation partner.

Snail mail: One month. Hardly anyone writes letters anymore (besides junk mail and holiday cards), so it’s understandable that receiving and sending letters should be meaningful.  The built-in excuse of the post office screwing up delivery works fine, as is the “I haven’t had a chance to mail it yet” defense, since it’s getting harder and harder to find a mailbox in the wild.  Going past a month makes it seem like you forgot about the initial letter, but responding too quickly (ie: sending out the next day) if no urgency is required creates a message of indifference, especially if a great deal of care was put into the letter you received.

Phone call: Two days. Much like email, the ubiquity of cell phones has made it harder for people to avoid taking a call than to receive one.  Anything from a movie to a root canal to a midday nap can postpone calling plans, although a response within 48 hours is usually enough even in the most dire of circumstances (and also can help prevent the dreaded ‘I forgot what I called about’ conversation).

Voicemail: One day. Unlike simply missing a call, a voicemail message, although it might translate to ‘call me back’ despite rambling on for several minutes, can increase the seeming urgency of communication.  The extra effort of the caller to stress the importance of a return call should translate to a faster response, but if the message itself is “call me back,” a two day maximum should be fine.

Text: Two hours.  When you get a text message, there are a few things you can count on: it will be short, it will be direct, and it will require you to focus more on typing back than making a call.  What you should remember is that texting occupies a weird cultural space where many people who use it take the messages as part of a conversation.  Dragging on a dialog because T9 isn’t working or because auto-correct is being a jerk creates the impression of a long, uncomfortable silence.  Keep your texts short and your breaks in texting chats shorter.

In-person conversation: Immediately.  Okay, fine, you can pause for effect.  But unless there’s some sort of emergency going on behind your conversational partner, there’s not much of an excuse for delaying a response when the real person is right in front of you.

Instant message: 90 minutes.  It’s called “instant” messaging for a reason.  Since you’re utilizing a larger keyboard, messages can (presumably) be typed faster.  This in turn creates less lag time, simulating a more realistic discussion.  It’s fine to brb for lunch, a meeting, the bathroom, a nap or anything else, but if you want to keep the conversation going, a period longer than an hour and a half will kill any momentum your talks were building.

Private message (social network): Five days.  It’s like email, but let’s be honest – you probably check your Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and other social network profiles a lot more frequently.  And since your activity might be visible to others, waiting for too long to respond makes you seem careless.

Public message (social network): Two days.  Unlike a private message, this one can be seen by anyone you’re in contact with.  In order to maintain a good online reputation, it’s better to answer these messages sooner rather than later.

Other communications: Use common sense.  As I’ve never sent a telegram, flagged anyone in semaphore, chatted via smoke signal or used several other methods of communication that, presumably, others use today, I can’t speak to proper response timing etiquette.  So if you’re paying by the word, making flailing arm gestures or relying on a fire, make the best of your time.

When it comes to communicating with other people, we have more options than ever before.  However, the social landscape is littered with sinkholes that make using the different methods trickier than ever before.  So if you’re not sure how long you can wait, or if you’re worried that you might come off as a jerk for replying after a certain amount of time, refer to this page: it just might save you from becoming blog fodder.

Share

05
May

I’ve always had trouble keeping New Year’s resolutions.  It seems silly that a time of year should dictate one’s preferences for personal growth and development, especially in the winter, when it’s too cold in most places to do much of anything.  Perhaps it would make more sense on the sunny shores of Australia, though I’d imagine that most Aussie resolutions would then have to do with getting a tan, taking surfing lessons, domesticating wombats, or doing other things beyond my mental stereotype of the Australian lifestyle, but I digress.  Any goal-setting should be done when the goal-setter is ready to actually accomplish their self-given mission; rushing it doesn’t help.

At the same time, I never got the idea of a Bucket List.  Sure, it’s a compendium of things to do before you die, but they’re all on the same level, having children holds equal importance to winning the famous 72-ounce steak challenge at the Big Texan in Amarillo.  And what do you win?  Death?  That’s hardly a good prize; you’ll win it either way, so maybe the prize is a smug sense of self-satisfaction.  But at least in the case of a Nicholson-Freeman adventure, there’s no time stamp on when to start.

I say all of this because I went against my better nature recently and set a few long-term goals.  So far, I’ve been keeping them, but finding the motivation to continue making progress is both a constant source of frustration and an exercise in self-denial.

Resolution 1: Get in shape.

Ever since I graduated from college (actually, a few months before that), my motivations to maintain a healthy lifestyle had been in a steady decline.  ”I’m not in shape, I’m just a shape,” I would joke. Even though my physical weight only increased by a few pounds, the ratio of fat to muscle shifted considerably.  In the past, I was a student of Yoga, Pilates and other flexibility-enhancing practices.  Now, it was a problem just to touch my toes.  Where I once could run for miles before a workout, I was getting winded walking a few blocks.  I always told myself that I would work out once I had more time; I would finally use the equipment and DVDs I’d amassed over a six-month fitness spree.

I was just collecting the tools and making excuses.

One lazy Saturday near the end of January, I found myself driving past a gym a couple of blocks from my office.  Having nothing better to do, I went in, and was immediately sucked into a sales pitch.  Twenty minutes later, I bought a two-year membership.  Even if I never used it, I could reconcile paying a $25 per month “fat tax.”  Instead, I wound up going at least five times a week since then.  I’ve lost a few pounds and have put on a bit of muscle.  This is literally the best I’ve felt in years.

Resolution 2: Work out the brain muscles.

I like to think that I’m a pretty smart guy.  Taught myself to read by the time I was three, honors classes from Elementary school on, high marks on the SATs when I was in middle school (took it for farts and giggles), and my IQ scores are in pretty good shape.  But all the brains in the world don’t matter if you’re not using them right.

In an odd moment of self-reflection a week before New Year’s, I realized that I had become too reliant on pop culture.  I was quoting movies, television, Internet and music constantly, bolstering my thoughts with the words and images of others.  Instead of finding original thoughts and content, I was turning into the human version of Family Guy: all filler and no real depth.  During this moment, I also realized that I hadn’t read a full book in over a year.  So I did what any rational person would do: an Amazon shopping spree.

I tore through three books in my first month, then moved on to a few titles I’d bought but never bothered reading – the kind you get to fluff out your bookshelf, promising to look at them “one day.”  Then, I bought more at a used bookstore.  Soon after, I went to Borders during a store closing sale.  And now, I’m back to Amazon for another round.

In the past few months, I’ve read a decent number of books, finishing the following: The Man Who Ate Everything, Sleepwalk With Me, Life After College, 5 Very Good Reasons to Punch a Dolphin in the Mouth, The Guinea Pig Diaries, The Year of Living Biblically, Microtrends, Persuasion, Eating the Dinosaur, Chew on This and The Economic Naturalist. There’s also the random Economist and New York Times articles and a whole mess of blog posts, short stories and assorted web links.  My brain has begun to revert to a pre-entertainment mindset; there are entire days that I can go without making references or callbacks to pop culture stuff.

In both cases, all I knew going in was that I wanted to make a change.  There’s been no real goal or set of accomplishment benchmarks, and I can’t point to a single factor that motivated me to begin either endeavor.  Instead, I reached the point where I accepted on a subconscious level that changes needed to be made and acted accordingly.  There doesn’t need to be a list or an event to determine when you start affecting positive results in your life; it can happen at any instant.

Keep all your bucket lists and New Year’s resolutions; I’ll do personal developments on my own time at my own pace.  Unless, that is, you’re in Australia.  Because if that’s the case, I’d really like to know what your resolutions are.

Share

28
Apr

Random Sabbatical!

Hey Everyone,

I’m going to be taking the next week, as I’m in the middle of taking care of a few non-bloggy things that have kept me distracted recently.  Posts resume next Thursday.

In the meantime, here’s a version of an original sketch that I received from comic book artist extraordinaire Jim Mahfood about 10 years ago that I found on an old laptop from my Photoshop experimenting days.  I think my request was “a dude with a bag over his head,” for reasons that are still a bit unclear to me today.  Draw your own conclusions!

Share

26
Apr

It happens at least twice a day, without fail.  Complete strangers, whether they have a reason to or not, start conversations with me about baseball.

“So, you’re a Yankees fan, eh?”

“Man, A-Rod’s not lookin’ too good this year, sucks for you guys.”

“I prefer the Red Sox.”

I know how baseball is played, and I’ve been to a few games, but it’s by no means my favorite sport, and if given a choice between watching a game and pulling weeds out of the backyard at 3:00 PM in Phoenix in July, I’ll probably be doing yard work.  But it’s not really my fault.  I don’t say or do anything directly to encourage sports talk.  I will go out of my way to avoid sports talk.  The blame for all this rests solely at the brim of my hat.  My only hat.  My Yankees hat.

I bought the baseball cap when I was fifteen and on a community service trip in Denver.  We were taking a break from helping at soup kitchens, clearing debris from dilapidated homes and doing other good deeds by sitting in the cheap seats at a Rockies game.  I’ve held a grudge against the Rockies ever  since they (needlessly) humiliated the Diamondbacks during their first-ever game, so choosing who to root for between them and the visiting Yankees was easy.  After a heated argument with one of the other trip-goers regarding which team sucked more, I decided to stick it to him by buying a $15 Official MLB Licensed One-Size-Fits-All Yankees baseball cap, which I wore with pride as the Bronx Bombers decimated the home team, 11 to 4.

It was the first hat I’d bought or worn in three years.  I haven’t bought any since.

My friends tend to give me grief about the hat.  ”You should buy another one,” some suggest.  ”What’re you gonna do when you visit Boston?” others tease, unaware that I had accidentally already done that, which led to many curses and death threats from random pedestrians.  The thing is, I don’t see any reason to get another hat.  I’m not concerned about style, and the piece of apparel does its job: keeping the sun off of my eyes.

So long as the brim isn’t broken and the hat fits, it works.  I don’t wear it often enough for the thing to become a trademark or for it to wear out (which is why it’s lasted almost a decade in almost the same condition as when I first bought it), and I don’t require the same versatility in hats that I might require in footwear, pants, or even belts.  One hat does its job, and that’s enough.  Some might say that it’s a minimalist hat collection, but it’s really an issue of utility.

It’s not like I haven’t thought about buying other hats.

Over the past few months, I’ve decided to become a bit more outdoorsy via hiking, running and being outside when the sun is out.  Though my skin is quite happy with being non-translucent these days, the nearness of Sol is still a bit of an issue, and my current hat doesn’t have any fancy cooling vents or UVA-/UVB -ray-blocking technologies.  I spent several hours over the course of one weekend at different outdoor and athletic shops, trying to find a good head coverer, and yet, among the $20 pairs of socks and $50 water bottles, between the $90 man-girdles and $5 sticks of something called “energy gum,” I couldn’t find a hat that cost less than a nice dinner at a four-star restaurant (tax, tip and drinks included).  There were some contenders, like the lightweight waterproof cap with moisture-wicking technology, and the desert commando-style topper with a retractable neck-covering back flap and built-in LED flashlight on the front of the brim, but none really worked for me.  None felt right.

Maybe one day, after a bad wash cycle or a strong gust of wind or an unfortunate incident on a roller coaster, I’ll need to give up the hat.  I’ll know the freedom of not having to pretend I know much or care at all about professional baseball.  I can escape the jeers and taunts of my many-hatted friends.  The sameness of a decade of utilitarian headpiece use will give way, as I will finally need to purchase a new cap.

But I’m pretty sure that I’ll only buy one.

Share

21
Apr

Being the first Jewish person that many people meet means that I usually have a lot of questions to answer. I’ve been quizzed on religious practices, philosophical leanings, dietary restrictions and almost every attribute of my faith.  And one of the more common questions regards “Jewish Easter,” which we just call “Passover.”

If you’ve never seen the Charlton Heston movie or the cartoon, Passover is about the freedom of the Jews from Egyptian oppression (and possible pyramid-building, depending on who you ask) and is a bit closer to Thanksgiving in relation to some of its themes.  However, the thing that most people remember about Passover is that it’s The Atkins Holiday.  The rules are as follows: no leavened bread (and rice and beans as well, for certain sects), an increase in prayer, and (sometimes) an increase in consumption of Kosher meals.

When I was younger, this was THE WORST THING EVER.

Without leavening, the bread of choice for most Passover-celebrators is matzo, a Biblical form of cardboard.  While it purports to be made of the same things as bread (sans lifting agents), it’s a lot more likely that it was a really lousy cracker that an ancient Israelite tried to pass off as the fault of Moses.  ”Joseph, I’m telling you that this woulda been bread!  But Mister Split The Red Sea over there rushed me, so I didn’t have time to leaven it.  Take it up with that guy when he comes back from whatever the heck he’s doing on that mountain.”

Life for a kid without leavening means that you can’t have cake, cookies, sandwiches, macaroni, and about 90% of the starchy diet of the average youth.  Sure, there’s an entire industry built around making “Passover-friendly” cake mixes and such, but it’s like having a low-fat donut; it doesn’t taste right, so much as passable.  Of course, this all happened before I realized what Passover restrictions truly were.

One of the best things about living in a global society is that the trade between cultures includes not just culture, technology and material goods, but cooking methods as well.  The Internet helps with that too.

In other words, Passover doesn’t have to be that bad!  Despite the simple-sounding restrictions that can cut a lot of items out of one’s diet, there are many more that observing Jews overlook out of deference to a generations-long tradition of gefilte fish and pot roast.  It simply became a habit to eat these things, and up until a few years ago, I had never even considered that foods like oatmeal, tacos, ice cream, kabobs and barbecue were acceptable under the holiday’s restrictions.

Then again, this practice is hardly unique.  People miss the forest for the trees all the time, on everything from using old passwords on work computers after they were just changed to sticking with brand preferences without investigating alternatives.  Once a routine is set, no matter how unpleasant, it’s hard to break out of it.  Sometimes, it can take an event of monumental importance to shift out of old ways of thinking.  Other times, it’s as simple as someone asking, “So on Passover, you can eat tacos because they’re made with shortening and not leavening, right?”

Share

19
Apr

NOTE: I do not condone or endorse cheating, infidelity or affairs.  This post is for illustrative and entertainment purposes only, and should not be taken as advice or tips by anyone.

There’s a lot of power in numbers.  Statistics can be manipulated to swing opinions one way or another, to discover hidden truths, or even for proving silly points (like this one or this one).  Economists, scientists, politicians, web developers, marketers and millions of other people depend on statistics for their livelihoods and professional success.  Statistical results drive the progress of the modern world.  They also drive your dating life.

In a recent-to-me post on Musings on Life and Love, dating blogger extraordinaire Dennis Hong  used math to debunk the myth of male promiscuity (in terms of quantity of partners, at least).  It’s highly worth a read.  But I’ll attempt to summarize it a lot more plainly and quickly:

In an environment with a split that is drawn right down the middle (ie: men versus women), it’s impossible for the sides to not even out.  The average of 5, 0, 0, 0 and 0 is the same as the average of 1, 1, 1, 1 and 1 (they’re both 1), and the average of 5, 1, 1, 1 and 1 is the same as the average of 1, 2, 2, 2 and 2 (it’s 1.8 in both cases).  Unless you decide to fake some alarmingly false and misleading restrictions, you cannot create a 3:1 ratio between both groups.  As a contribution to the set requires an even contribution for each side (1 point to each), the numbers will always balance.

Dennis explains it much better.

The thing about Dr. Hong’s post is that it made me realize that there are other mathematical procedures that are involved in the dating dance.  And one of the biggest proponents of this is infidelity.

If you’ve seen the film A Beautiful Mind, you might remember the scene in which Russell Crowe’s character explains to his colleagues that by dividing their attention evenly among several women instead of all competing for one, they increase their chances for enjoying some mattress mambo that night.  The men expand their search group and remove overlap, resulting in less competition an an easier time attracting the ladies.  This exemplifies Game Theory (specifically the Nash equilibrium described above) and is a good example of why competition is bad.  But that’s just the beginning.

Let’s say that you’re getting $50 in cash.  You have two choices: a $50 bill, or two $20 bills and a $10 bill.  Which would you rather have?

Wait, let’s change that.  Which of these would you like? You can have: a twenty, two tens, a five and five ones; ten ones, two fives, a ten and a twenty; two twenties and two fives; five tens; fifty ones; or seven fives, a ten and five ones.

Which one of those choices was easier to make?  Chances are, it was the one with less options, unless you really like George Washington or Abe Lincoln.

The more choices a person has, the more difficult is is for them to make a decision.*  When we have fewer options to work with, it is simpler to think analytically and critically.  A or B?  True or False?  Yes or No?  Eliminating the middle ground and reducing comparisons makes things so much simpler.  It’s far easier to fight one person than ten.  And this is why it’s easier to attract someone who’s in a relationship: your competition is much lower.

When you’re single, you could feasibly have all of those plenty of fish in the sea people keep talking about.  Your potential dating pool and all of your possible suitors are literally everyone who matches your partner preferences when it comes to gender and orientation.  That’s between 10 and 50 percent of the population if we don’t skim down spiritual, personality, ethnic, physical, mental and emotional restrictions.  And even then, there are hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people you could be with.

When you’re in a relationship, you’re with one person.

For those of you who failed out of basic math, 1,000,000 is a heck of a lot more than 1.

For the enterprising homewrecking cad, laziness is key.  They don’t need to be more attractive, clever, intelligent, wealthy, interesting or powerful than everyone else in the club or bar.  They just need to be better than the person their target is with.

There’s more that could be said about the travails of a serious relationship, the difficulties of monogamy and the psychology of a cheater.  But really, it’s just more convenient to choose from one of two options than it is to choose from a veritable smorgasbord of thousands.  When we’re more limited in our options, we make easier (but not necessarily better) decisions.  That’s why it’s easier to find someone you want to be with when you’re in a relationship than it is when you’re single.

Then again, that could just be statistics manipulating your brain.

*For more on this, read up on choice modelling if you feel so inclined

Share